HOMILY by Joan Mooney ST MARY IN EXILE January 23rd-24th 2010

John » 25 January 2010 » In Homilies »

HOMILY  by Joan Mooney Jan 23rd-24th 2010

Some years ago one of my brothers was in Ireland researching our family history. One day, not being sure of a destination he asked directions of a bystander. The gentleman replied, ‘Ah well, you go along here, then you turn right, and then you turn right etc etc’. It was all very complicated, and he ended with ……‘but if I was you I wouldn’t be startin’ from here.’

I am calling this talk ‘the way forward.’ One day Thomas, one of the disciples, said to Jesus, “we do not know where we are going, so how can we know the way?’ To get anywhere, then, we need to know not only our destination and the way there, but , most important of all, where we are starting from, where we are now.

TS Eliot puts it-
In order to arrive there,
To arrive where you are, to get from where you are not,
You must go by a way wherein there is no ecstasy.
In order to arrive at what you do not know
You must go by a way which is the way of ignorance.

We live in a very future-oriented world. An article by Kevin Rudd in The Australian this week is entitled – How we can achieve a more productive future. He begins …….
As we enter the 2nd decade of the 21st century, we can be optimistic about our future. But we cannot be complacent.

The catchcry of education today is –prepare them for the future. Then there are the ‘futures funds’, whose meaning escapes me entirely, and countless other futures predictions.

What many are forgetting about, is to consider where we are now, for to know where we are now is to know who we are.

To know where we are now is to know our place in history, for the way forward is the way back. The great contribution of Charles Darwin was to show us our position in the chain of evolution. And history is more than facts and data. That part is easy. History, as the word implies, is story, and story includes experience and understanding. We have all kinds of stories to investigate –more than investigate, we have to enter a story, walk around in it , absorb its message, its wisdom, and translate it into an understanding and a guide for ourselves and our own time. We have all sorts of stories – family stories, literary, ancestral, national, global, universal, cosmic etc. A crucial genre of story, in my view, is our religious story. A person I was speaking to recently dismissed our religious heritage as ‘mere fairy stories.’ Unknown to him, his statement was ironic, for fairy stories also hold wisdom.

Why are our religious stories of such importance? Because they contain wisdom. I am not , of course , speaking of literalism and dogmatism, but of the pearls of wisdom hidden in our scriptures. I beg to differ from the person who recently stated that God did not write the scriptures. Divine wisdom, in my view, is clearly evident in our Christian, as well as in the  scriptures of other religious traditions.

To cut people off from their history, from their story, as happened in the dispossession of land of our own and other indigenous people; in the displacement of peoples through war and exile is to deny them their very humanity.

Of course, we don’t want to get stuck in the past, either, to cling to clearly outmoded practices or world views. The thread that binds us to our history is both strong and fragile, and brings us right down to our present time.

What , then, can we do to answer the question in Drew Dellinger’s poem

my great great grandchildren
ask me in dreams
what did you do while the planet was plundered

Drew Dellinger is a contemporary American philosopher and poet, recently in Brisbane.

In a recent interview, Andrew Denton asked the distinguished White House journalist, Helen Thomas   ‘what do you see as the future of our species?’
She answered – I don’t care about the future, but I worry about how we are now.   -  people killed by wars, the gas chambers, people discriminated against.’ Among a battery of journalists hers was the only voice to publicly challenge George Bush on the torture of Iraqis by American soldiers She asked later- where were they, where were all the colleagues who should have spoken out in support? When Peter and Terry were dismissed from St Mary’s, unjustly, was there a single colleague, a single bishop, a single priest who came publicly to their defence or support. Where were they? We may well ask.

In a recent talk Drew Dellinger suggests that a way forward for is to listen to the voice of women. There’s no shortage of women’s voices in this community, but in most societies and communities throughout the world, despite the great feminist movement, women are still largely unheard. Most commentators judged the Copenhagen meeting a flop. Penny Wong would have been there, but amidst the large array of men in suits I didn’t notice many women.

Most ages of history have made a specific  contribution to our human story eg the cathedrals of medieval Europe, the plays of Shakespeare, the inventions of modern science etc. Drew Dellinger opines that the unique contribution of our era may well be our embracing of ecology. This is more than planting a few trees, important in a practical way  as that is; ecology implies understanding , entering the story of our earth; going further, to cosmology – the story, not just the scientific, facts, of the universe. Cosmology is recognising the interconnectedness of all things, and therefore treating all creatures, all things, with respect, compassion and love.

‘Lifting millions out of subsistence living should be our moral imperative’, writes journalist John Cox. Development is not necessarily a dirty word. Here again the way forward may well be the way back.  Harry S Truman’s inaugural address in 1949 used the word ‘development’ to commit the US to world economic progress. ‘The present focus on terrorism and globalisation makes me pine for the idealism of the 2nd half of C20’, writes Cox. The fierce opposition in the US to Barack Obama’s proposed health reforms is born of the unwillingness of Middle America to share their wealth with the poor, especially the black poor. They are forgetting that in degrading these people they are degrading their own flesh and blood.

Then we have to wake up the dreamers, the poets, the philosophers, the statesmen, of today. A young boy, Laurie Wallis, topped the NSW HSC English course for a sequence of poems in which he meditates on mankind, nature and language. This is a voice, the voice of youth, which we could well heed.

And we have to wake up ourselves. We are all depositaries of wisdom, but on the whole we don’t know how to access it. We can’t just sit around waiting for sparks of wisdom to come forth, we have to prepare the ground.  The great C16 Spanish mystic, Teresa of Avila, tells us that after spending 20 years meditating, patiently and perseveringly, she experienced a Divine and transforming illumination.  Mozart wrote 41 symphonies. On one occasion he saw in his minds eye an entire symphony. But Mozart, too, had done the hard yards. From the age of three he had studied music, worked at his harmony ezercises. Then there was more more hard work, translating the wisdom of that symphony into a format that others could access. And so we can listen to the great Mozart symphonies today.

On the other hand, the spirit breathes where she will. In our Peace Dance tradition there is a beautiful song and dance. The text is
Suddenly, at any mundane moment, the infinite may come through.

If we are lucky, wisdom may simply strike us out of the blue. As the first reading for today says,

‘wisdom walks about looking for those who are worthy of her.

A pity if we do not recognise her. For Wisdom comes in many guises. She won’t always come as a full-blown symphony.  TS Eliot reminds us–
The only Wisdom we can hope to acquire
Is the wisdom of humility

That, surely, is accessible to us all.

KR urged us not to be complacent; Goenka, a meditation teacher in the Vipassana tradition, says over and over. Every moment is so precious; we cannot afford to lose a single moment.We can glibly dismiss the fleeting moment as  just that, but this moment,  to give TS Eliot the final word,

‘is not isolated, with no before and after,
But a lifetime burning in every moment
And not the lifetime of one man only
But of old stones that cannot be deciphered.

We must seize that moment.

Trackback URL

9 Comments on "HOMILY by Joan Mooney ST MARY IN EXILE January 23rd-24th 2010"

  1. jfitzwalter
    Paul Curry
    25/01/2010 at 9:00 am Permalink

    What a load of crap!!!, no wonder the church disallows women priests!!

  2. jfitzwalter
    Perry Mason
    26/01/2010 at 9:47 pm Permalink

    Still in victim mode over the ‘unjust’ sacking of Terry and Peter? Let’s try to think rationally about it:
    The church building has been restored to its rightful owner. It’s now being used in its proper role as a house of Catholic worship. Peter and Terry have proclaimed how wonderful it is to be liberated from any further pretense of following Catholic doctrine. The community seems to agree with this, judging from the talks recorded on this website.
    I don’t see any hint of ‘injustice’ in this. On the contrary, it seems to have resulted in happy outcomes for all concerned.

  3. jfitzwalter
    John
    17/02/2010 at 10:45 pm Permalink

    Do the ‘all concerned’ include those baptized, reared and educated within Catholicism and is the outcome of their ceasing to practice and to adhere to Catholicism considered a happy outcome also!

  4. jfitzwalter
    Perry Mason
    18/02/2010 at 8:30 am Permalink

    John, I’m sure you understand I was having a dig at those who cry ‘foul!’, ‘unjust!’ with one breath and ‘how liberating!’ with the next. Those who chose to walk away with Peter Kennedy and haven’t come back to St Mary’s are presumably happy where they are.

    Following on from Peter Kennedy’s talk at Rockhampton, might we now see a ‘homily’ where somebody has the decency to apologise to the Bishop and acknowledge that Kennedy’s dismisal as parish priest was in no way ‘unjust’ but one hundred percent fair and reasonable?

    Those who wal

  5. jfitzwalter
    Shar Ryan
    04/03/2010 at 10:23 am Permalink

    Perry we did not see how our community could continue to exist and grow within the CC when we, the people in the pews, were not recognised in the process. I wrote about a dozen letters to Archbishop Bathersby and received only two replies. One was the pro forma letter to all who wrote early in the piece which unfortunately suggested that we were not people of prayer. The second came after I wrote a letter trying to explain that many of us were looking for more in our relationship with God than we found in the local churches. I added a ps Last week Brendan and I celebrated our Golden Wedding ……..celebrating over 60 years as committed Christians and Catholics.. Yes I got a reply – a certificate congratulating us on celebrating our Golden Wedding.
    In one I urged the need for prayer together – perhaps two or three of us with the Archbishop and a couple people of his choice. As I explained – not prayer for our (or his) desired outcome but the prayer of listening to the God within us all with the desire to reach an understanding of each others attitudes and thus opening up the possibility of agreement. I even had the temerity to offer to visit Wynburg with this in mind.
    This lack of consultation with the community was certainly difficult to understand.

  6. jfitzwalter
    Perry Mason
    05/03/2010 at 2:41 pm Permalink

    With regard to the Great Dismissal, it is well worth remembering that it was not the congregation who were dismissed but the parish priest Peter Kennedy. Some people went with him – that was their choice. They also had the choice of staying and welcoming and working with the new parish priest (as happens routinely in other parishes).
    It has been said that more or better communication might have led to a compromise outcome. I think that is a furphy. We now know that Peter Kennedy was a closet atheist masquerading as a catholic priest. The only ‘compromise’ possible was one that would have allowed him to continue the deception for a while longer.

  7. jfitzwalter
    John
    05/03/2010 at 9:14 pm Permalink

    Perry how is it that you can say the congregation was not dismissed, when it was never consulted with, even after repeated attempts to initiate consultation with Archbishop John, was there ever an investigation into the claims brought against St Mary’s? In what other areas of society would this process occur? Is the church its people? Why is it that so few of those baptized and raised in Catholicism no longer adhere to it? Could it be said that the church has dismissed them also in it’s unwillingness to engage with them? Possibly this congregation followed Peter and Terry, not blindly but as people with sight, capable of seeing clearly the predicament of the church in this time and possibly the congregation given that lack of engagement had no option but to move, irrespective of Peter and Terry’s actions.

  8. jfitzwalter
    Perry Mason
    06/03/2010 at 9:34 am Permalink

    I say that the bishop dismissed the priest, not the congregation, because that is objectively, publicly, what happened. You have said that the bishop adopted a dismissive manner towards the congregation. You obviously feel strongly about that, and I am not in any position to make a comment on it. I’m left wondering, however, after several posts here, what exactly was the nature of the consultation and engagement you sought. Was it over any matter that the bishop might have had authority to grant?
    I also wonder why it seems to concern you so much that people are leaving the church. If someone leaves the church, assuming they have thought about it and not just drifted away, it must be because they fundamentally disagree with church teaching. Isn’t it a Good Thing that people leave a false belief system to strike out on their own or join a group which is closer to the truth?
    Coming back to my original observation on ‘injustice’, I have not seen anything posted here to show that an injustice has been perpetrated. People have found the church to be inadequate for them and walked away. It happens all the time.

  9. jfitzwalter
    Ingerid Meagher
    07/03/2010 at 2:19 pm Permalink

    Shar Ryan was privileged to receive not one but two replies from the Archbishop. I wrote a letter that set out my family’s ties and experiences with the Catholic Church. The reverberations are still felt today, 3 generations later. My letter also spoke of the delight and the hope I found at St Mary’s – a delight at finding an open, honest, progressive, inclusive church and where one experienced hope for the future of the church. In fact my last sentence (naively) read: “The Church hierarchy would have done well to allow St Mary’s South Brisbane to be a trail blazer, a shiny example of a Church into the 21st century.”

    I never received so much as an acknowledgement of my letter in which, after all, I bared a family history which hitherto had been rather private. I would have been happy knowing the letter had been received and read. In the circumstances a response might have been an impossibility considering the deluge of correspondence at the time.

Hi Stranger, leave a comment:

ALLOWED XHTML TAGS:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to Comments