Peter Kennedy Homilist August 22 2010
Recent discoveries about the first three centuries of Christianity clarify for us today, some seventeen hundred years later, how early Christianity deteriorated from a movement focused on a new age of freedom, healing and compassion into a religious empire focussed on mandatory/ prescribed doctrines/ creeds, strictly monitored by a powerful priestly hierarchy. The Constantinian Roman Empire became “ Christian” and Christianity that had offered an alternative culture, became Roman and imperial.
What had been a loose network of local congregations with varied forms of leadership and ritual, a movement of faith focussed on the Jesus story, which is essentially about a new age of freedom, healing and compassion coagulated into a rigid structure of beliefs about Jesus. One historian estimates that in the two and a half centuries after Constantine, Christian imperial authorities put twenty five thousand to death for their lack of creedal consciousness.
An increasingly disenfranchised laity, and women in particular , who played such a vital role in the earliest years of Christianity were pushed to the underside and the edges. Those discoveries suggest that Christianity was not fated to develop as it did – a different historical trajectory was possible. In other words Christianity now has a second chance.
Today a combination of circumstances makes possible a new outlook that might be more like the first three centuries and less like the last fifteen hundred years that Harvey Cox calls the Age of Belief. Not only do we know more about the actual origins of the Jesus movement than any generation since the first century itself, but – even more important Christianity is no longer a “ western religion”, it has recently exploded into a global one. Its vital centres now lie in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and this affords unprecedented new opportunities. We are talking about Christianity as a whole – not one particular Christian denomination.
Having said that, there is no road back to the primitive church that some Protestants long for or to the high medieval and glorious church that some Catholics dream of. But there is one thing we can all agree on concerning the future of Christianity, that if there is to be a future, Christianity must return to its roots and focus its energies not on hierarchy, not on creeds, but on what some call the Dream of God – a dream that billions of people on this planet long for everyday – a global community in which all people regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation – in fact all living things, including and especially the planet itself, are treated with respect, dignity and practical compassion for all those who are most vulnerable – for what we do is surely far more important than what we believe. Otherwise Christianity has become something different from its original vision. Knowing about the past is vital, not to return to it, but to learn from it- understanding our past can reopen roads that might have been taken but were not. There is within Catholicism an unhealthy emphasis on tradition – a tradition based on the fiction of Apostolic Succession, which locks Catholics into a belief in certain doctrines and moral absolutes that are no longer tenable.
This is why it is so imperative that we have both the most accurate picture of the origins of Christianity possible and the clearest grasp of the sweep and dynamism of the new global Christianity.
Chapter 4 “ The Road Runner and the Gospel of Thomas” of Harvey Cox’s book “The Future of Faith” from which I have taken this homily is available for you to take home – it will help to clarify for “ those with ears to listen” where this community is presently at and hopefully will continue down that “ road less travelled” – otherwise in my opinion , we have clearly lost our way.

08/08/2010 at 9:23 pm Permalink
Two things come to mind about the recorded history of the early church.
1. The tendency of some local communities to a falling away from the faith, and having to be rebuked and brought back into line by the Apostles or the Apostles’ successors.
2. The first church council in Jerusalem which would have been attended by some people who had been taught personally by Jesus. (Interestingly, no women are mentioned as taking part, even though this is well within the ‘pure’ period of church history.) The agenda had nothing to with how best to help the poor or liberate the oppressed, but with the doctrinal issue of whether gentiles were required to be circumcised.
09/08/2010 at 3:55 pm Permalink
perhaps i was a tad harsh on you Perry in my previous blog post. i will share a funny story – early this year when my dad attended his regular 5pm sunday SMX mass (while i was playing organ up the road at the old st mary’s) there was some fella handing out mass sheets from the OLD st mary’s at the smx mass (not sure exactly why) and my dad took an old st mary’s mass sheet by mistake. my dad’s there for a good 20 minutes into the SMX mass, singing the hymn and responsorial psalm thinking to himself “hmm.. these do not seem like the right words!!”. then it finally dawned what had happened. i am good friends with my dad – he’s been so supportive of me over many years, and particularly since i went back to help with the music at the old st mary’s since late 2009 – dad loves the music i write for my old church.
this is why i say, the st mary’s story of the last 2 years is not JUST about doctrine, politics, theology, as important as all that is, the st mary’s story is about people.
10/08/2010 at 9:39 pm Permalink
I am not a Catholic but my husband and his family are and I find the Catholic faith very . . . I can’t find the words. But reading the words in this post makes me want to be a part of this faith and community.
30/10/2010 at 5:09 pm Permalink
Jesus is reported as saying – by their fruit you will know them – not a breath of doctrine!
31/01/2011 at 12:34 pm Permalink
I need to hear exactly what Belinda thinks with that
refinance auto loans